The explanatory variables and the real GDP, five additional variables and explanatory variables such as macroeconomic performance, with the trend of a time with each other as real GDP - the two employment models are specified. April 1991 to March 2001 and OLSQ regressions for the monthly data on real gross domestic product, industry employment elasticities are obtained. Extensive empirical results of GDP decrease of real variables to determine the relationship between employment and real gross domestic product to underscore the importance of control. Results Five "jobless recovery" (with a negative impact on employment elasticities) characteristics and performance of a wide range of industry categories of industries identified in the employment elasticities.Can.

In November 2001 NBER official permanent record of 120 months in April 1991 and March 2001 the last full round of economic growth in the U.S. economy was in the beginning. Real GDP growth and America's total U.S. non-farm employment increased rapidly during this period. Between 1991:4 and 2001:3 real GDP grew by 49.0 percent and 22.5 percent of total non-farm employment increased. However, as the increase in employment in all industries was not.In fact, this period of political debate, to ask if the business was changed to highlight the nature and economies. "New economy" such as, broad economic changes on the business potential of institutional, structural and operational impact both performance and relationships that already observed macroeconomic variables affect the direction of the force? Especially in the structure of employment in industries with high added new uncertainties to differences and changes in real gross domestic product in relation to the proportion of industry-specific jobs.

The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, estimates and changes in real GDP for the year in respect of non-agricultural employment elasticities in each of 14 industries than the 1991 -2001 U.S. economic expansion, in order for any industry The second estimate two models for the provision of employment and the economy. As an explanatory variable in a model that includes only real gross domestic product. several important additional measures of macroeconomic performance on the second count extends explanatory variables. Regression models for these two groups with respect to industry-specific, real GDP growth rate used to determine the impact of these macro variables are comparable.is.

Previous studies of employment in the industry in the U.S. economy has different forms. Some studies fiction (Goodman, Antczak, and Freeman, 1993; Goodman, 1994, 1997, Clinton, Clinton and Hatch, 2000), and suggest how different macroeconomic forces that affect industry employment in broad categories. (; Shin, 1999; Berman and Pfleeger, 1997 Goodman, 2001), other studies adopt a methodology based on the figures. And / or changes in patterns of employment expansion in recession (Goodman, 1994 compared to; Goodman, 2001, several authors, the gender gap in employment cyclicality (; Goodman, 1994, Shin, 1999 Shin, 2000 Goodman, Antczak, and Freeman, 1993), the check). Shin (2000) to study the econometric estimates of real gross domestic product and employment elasticity in terms of gender differences in employment cyclicality check conducted.